[PolyORB-users] Additional pragmas defined by IDL to Ada mapping v1.3

[oliver.kellogg at t-online.de]

On 2011-06-14 17:48:10, Thomas Quinot wrote: 

	> >   This
 > >                   FEU.Expr_Value (E)
 > >   does not look right to me, shouldn't that be
 > >                   FEU.Expr_Value (Expression (E))
 > 
> No because Expr_Value (E) is Expr_Value (Expression (E))
 > case to E's nominal type (see
> Analyze_And_Resolve_Constant_Declaration_Or_Case_Label_Expr).

 Ah, I see. 

	I got slightly confused because frontend-nodes.idl defines a Value
member in Constant_Declaration but also in Expression. 

	What is the reason for the extra Value in Constant_Declaration? 

	Thanks, 

	Oliver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/polyorb-users/attachments/20110614/97210ff7/attachment.htm