[AWS] Having more then 1000 concurrent connections?

[Tomas J Stehlik]

Hi Zhu,

Regarding static files, you are not in the right place. AWS is for Ada-based
software.

For static files, there are other solutions. Consider Nginx.

Yours sincerely, 

Tomas


-----Original Message-----
From: aws-bounces at lists.adacore.com [mailto:aws-bounces at lists.adacore.com]
On Behalf Of Zhu Qun-Ying
Sent: 25 August 2011 18:16
To: aws
Subject: Re: [AWS] Having more then 1000 concurrent connections?

Hi,

When I said scale, I am talking about under the stress condition shown in  
the benchmark:   
http://nbonvin.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/serving-small-static-files-which-ser
ver-to-use/.

The number of concurrent connection, request per second and memory usage  
all come into consideration.


On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:15:15 -0700, Pascal Obry <pascal at obry.net> wrote:

>
> Ted,
>
>> Logically, you'd think there would be a point somewhere (1,000?,
>> 100,000? 1 Million?) where creating more tasks starts to bog down the
>> CPU a bit. Perhaps that isn't true?
>
> I'm pretty sure that's true, but an important point is the data
> bandwidth and I'm sure that this will be the dominant factor.
_______________________________________________
AWS mailing list
AWS at lists.adacore.com
/no-more-mailman.html