[PolyORB-users] PolyORB / Mico oneway procedure interoperability?

[Jerome Hugues]

Rémi Lafage (remi.lafage at cena.fr):

> Oups! Yes, indeed!
> Good job you found it! (That was just to see if my test is reused.  ;-)

Sort of reused, consider downloading PolyORB from the CVS, go to 
testsuite/corba/interop/common, you'll see an adaptation of your
client code for omniORB and MICO, and the Makefile for MICO in
testsuite/corba/interop/MICO

> Well, I fix my previous post on Mico client oneway test results :
> It never works.  The test crashes or fails.
> 
> The test is fixed, now it's PolyORB's turn?!  :-)

No, the issue is closed, with latest wavefront from PolyORB, and
MICO 2.3.11, I get the following

hugues at neraka examples/corba/all_functions $ ./server 
Loading configuration from polyorb.conf
No polyorb.conf configuration file.
'IOR: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'

hugues at neraka interop/cpp/MICO $ ./all_functions_client
'IOR: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'
==> Begin test Different invocation modes<==
test void one way procedure................................. : PASSED
END TESTS................................................... : PASSED

The crash you're observing with 1.2r has been corrected a while ago, I
suppose.

-- 
Jerome