[gtkada] question when migrating to Gtkada 3.x
Rob Groen
robgr at xs4all.nl
Sun Jun 16 22:16:31 CEST 2013
Hello all,
I've start migrating to Gtkada 3.x and encountered a pecularity. It
concerns Gtk.Widget.Add_Accelerator.
In the migration guide in Ch14 of the UG nothing is mentioned about a
change to Add_Accelerator.
However, In Gtkada 2.x it is declared as:
procedure Add_Accelerator
(Widget : access Gtk_Widget_Record;
Accel_Signal : Glib.Signal_Name;
Accel_Group : Gtk.Accel_Group.Gtk_Accel_Group;
Accel_Key : Gdk.Types.Gdk_Key_Type;
Accel_Mods : Gdk.Types.Gdk_Modifier_Type;
Accel_Flags : Gtk.Accel_Group.Gtk_Accel_Flags);
In Gtkada 3.x it is declared as:
procedure Add_Accelerator
(Widget : not null access Gtk_Widget_Record;
Accel_Signal : UTF8_String;
Accel_Group : not null access
Gtk.Accel_Group.Gtk_Accel_Group_Record'Class;
Accel_Key : Gtk.Accel_Group.Gtk_Accel_Key;
Accel_Mods : Gdk.Types.Gdk_Modifier_Type;
Accel_Flags : Gtk.Accel_Group.Gtk_Accel_Flags);
where Gtk.Accel_Group.Gtk_Accel_Key is
type Gtk_Accel_Key is record
Accel_Key : Gdk.Types.Gdk_Key_Type;
Accel_Mods : Gdk.Types.Gdk_Modifier_Type;
Accel_Flags : Gtk_Accel_Flags;
end record;
Now this seems strange to, as Accel_Mods and Accel_Flags seem to be
doubled in the record declaration
and in the Add_Accelerator formal params. Is this correct? If not what
is correct?
Are there other known pecularities?
Best regards
Rob Groen
More information about the gtkada
mailing list