[gtkada] how is the effort for porting gate to glade-3 gui?
Dani
listasdani at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 07:11:32 CEST 2007
Hi.
Ok, I believe this is the better aproach, too.
What you believe will be better?
1) With "command line" (and without .gladep file) why options will be
relevant?
2) Do I have substitute the ex-parsed "nodes" from .gladep
with (raw?) strings or create fake nodes ? (both with source
strings/options from
command line)
Thank's in Advance!!!!!!
And I'm gratefully to you, because our attention and patience. Thank's Very
Very Very Mutch!!!
[]'s of seventy rounds, Dani :-)
p.s> ahh! thank's for understanding my bad English, too.
2007/4/21, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore.com>:
>
> > Hi. I need know you opinion about this comments; what you think about? I
> > need known what you think will be better? for me take a "north" to
> > continue.
>
> I still think not requiring any .gladep seems the way to go.
>
> Arno
>
--
"There are many plans in the Human heart, But
is the Lord's Purpose that prevails"
[]'s Dani:-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/gtkada/attachments/20070423/4a99dea7/attachment.htm
More information about the gtkada
mailing list