[gtkada] [OT] about new mailing list setting

[Ken Thompson]

But why intentionally produce duplicates. Some of us must (because of work)
use mailers that will not filter duplicates. For me, it will make the list
no longer worthwhile. I have enough mail to filter thru now without that


> -----Original Message-----
> From: gtkada-admin at lists.act-europe.fr
> [mailto:gtkada-admin at lists.act-europe.fr]On Behalf Of Arnaud Charlet
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:48 AM
> To: gtkada at lists.act-europe.fr
> Subject: [gtkada] [OT] about new mailing list setting
>
>
> I'm glad to see that my essage generated such number of replies.
> Apparently more people were able to answer my email than to post
> or answer questions about GtkAda itself :-)
>
> Before continuing this debate, I'd suggest everyone take a look at
> the following and the associated two URLs:
>
> <<
> There are many reasons not to introduce or override the Reply-To:
> header. One
> is that some posters depend on their own Reply-To: settings to
> convey their
> valid return address. Another is that modifying Reply-To: makes
> it much more
> difficult to send private replies.
>
> See `Reply-To' Munging Considered Harmful:
>  http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> for a general discussion of this issue.
>
> See Reply-To Munging Considered Useful for a dissenting opinion:
>  http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
> >>
>
> Have fun reading. I haven't seen any new argument provided on
> this list so far.
>
> Arno
> _______________________________________________
> gtkada mailing list
> gtkada at lists.act-europe.fr
> http://lists.act-europe.fr/mailman/listinfo/gtkada
>