[GnomeAda] Which CORBA-implementation?
Hans-Olof Danielsson
Hans-Olof.Danielsson@swipnet.se
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 20:45:37 +0100
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00AB_01C09210.17235F20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
There are at least two GPL-ed CORBA-implementations that are potentialy =
usefull for GNOME programming with Ada:
1. AdaBroker implemented in Ada95,
2. ORBit not implemented in Ada95 with an Ada binding implemented by =
GACK, the GNU Ada CORBA Kit.
Which implementation is most usefull for GNOME/Ada programmimg and what =
are the advantages and disadvantages for each? I see at least one =
advantage for AdaBroker and that is that it is implemented in Ada.
HOD
Hans-Olof Danielsson, Danitek AB, Dragspelsv. 20, S-732 32 Arboga, =
Sweden
Tel: int +46 589 140 38, Email: Hans-Olof.Danielsson@swipnet.se
Web: www.node98.com/danitek, Member of Node98 www.node98.com
------=_NextPart_000_00AB_01C09210.17235F20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>There are at least two GPL-ed =
CORBA-implementations=20
that are potentialy usefull for GNOME programming with Ada:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1. AdaBroker implemented in =
Ada95,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>2. ORBit not implemented in Ada95 with =
an Ada=20
binding implemented by GACK, the GNU Ada CORBA Kit.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Which implementation is most usefull =
for GNOME/Ada=20
programmimg and what are the advantages and disadvantages for each? I =
see at=20
least one advantage for </FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>AdaBroker and =
that is=20
that it is i</FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>mplemented in =
Ada.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>HOD<BR><BR>Hans-Olof Danielsson, Danitek AB, Dragspelsv. 20, S-732 =
32=20
Arboga, Sweden<BR>Tel: int +46 589 140 38, Email: <A=20
href=3D"mailto:Hans-Olof.Danielsson@swipnet.se">Hans-Olof.Danielsson@swip=
net.se</A><BR>Web:=20
<A href=3D"http://www.node98.com/danitek">www.node98.com/danitek</A>, =
Member of=20
Node98 <A=20
href=3D"http://www.node98.com">www.node98.com</A><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>=
------=_NextPart_000_00AB_01C09210.17235F20--