[GAP] Ada for security (rather than safety, reliability)?
Florian Villoing
villoing at adacore.com
Wed Feb 13 10:33:04 CET 2008
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:58:08 -0700
Bo Sanden <bsanden at acm.org> wrote:
> This came up in a class discussion. I haven't researched it.
>
> Some security vulnerabilities are caused by abusable syntax in widely
> used languages. Are there examples where Ada has been chosen expressly
> to avoid such vulnerabilities? If not, are there examples where security
> has been mentioned along with other concerns such as safety or
> reliability as reasons for choosing Ada?
You can have a look at the following slides:
https://libre.adacore.com/Software_Matters/03-C_pitfalls.pdf
--
-- Florian Villoing
-- AdaCore - our developers are our support team --
More information about the GAP
mailing list